PubArx:2026.00006v1 Thesis or dissertation chapter Preprint

Multi-Agent Daily Planning System (MADPS): A GAIA-Based Architecture for Dynamic Scheduling

Shuvam Agarwala1, Ali Mohammadi Ruzbahani1
  1. 1University of Calgary
Published 4 November 2026

Abstract

This document outlines the GAIA methodology design for a single-user Multi-Agent Daily Planning System (MADPS) engineered to generate, adapt, and personalize daily schedules. The architecture consists of three core autonomous components: the User Profile Agent (UPA), the Task Management Agent (TMA), and the Planning & Adaptation Agent (PAA). MADPS is designed to maximize priority satisfaction under constraints, minimize re-planning latency and schedule churn during task disruptions, and personalize schedules by learning user energy curves and preference weights. To support these objectives, the system employs FIPA-style interaction protocols and a dual-strategy PAA workflow, utilizing rapid, greedy local repairs for minor schedule disruptions and Genetic Algorithm (GA)-driven global optimization for system-wide impacts. Proposed schedules are evaluated using a comprehensive fitness function that carefully weights priority satisfaction, energy alignment, transition minimization, and hard constraint penalties to ensure feasible and highly optimized daily plans.

Full text

Read the paper on this page (18 pages), or open the PDF on its own.

Open the PDF

Community review

Posted as a preprint without a request for formal review. Researchers who sign in with ORCID can endorse it and discuss it below. How this works

0reviews 0endorsements 0comments
Endorse

A short, signed statement that you have read the paper and consider it sound and valuable.

Sign in to endorse
Review

A structured, signed review: an overall assessment, a summary and your main concerns.

The authors have not requested formal review for this paper.

Both are public, signed with your name and ORCID iD, and tied to version 1. You declare that you have no conflict of interest with the paper.

Endorsements 0

No endorsements for this version yet.

Reviews 0

The authors have not requested formal review for this paper.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Sign in to take part in the discussion.

Sign in