PubArx:2026.00008v1 Research article Open for review

PIA: Agentic Physics-Informed Runtime Anomaly Detection

Ali Mohammadi Ruzbahani1, Abbas Yazdinejad2, Hadis Karimipour1
  1. 1University of Calgary
  2. 2University of Regina
Published 8 November 2026

Abstract

Runtime anomaly detectors for cyber-physical systems are either learned as black boxes from normal data, which miss stealthy manipulations that keep every signal inside its normal range, or derived by hand from physical models, which requires expert effort for every plant. We introduce physics-informed agents (PIA), in which a large language model agent writes the detector itself as a set of physical residuals, such as pump characteristics, tank mass balances, and controller logic, and refines every candidate against normal operating data through an evaluation workbench before deployment. The result is a compact, human-readable detector that runs in milliseconds and names the component behind each alarm. On the BATADAL water distribution attack benchmark, PIA with Claude Opus 5.5 reaches an F1 of 0.878 on the test attacks against 0.504 for the strongest of six statistical and deep baselines, keeps detecting attacks concealed by replayed and offset sensor readings, and attributes every detected test attack to the attacked component. Ablations show that testing hypotheses against data is decisive: agents that write residuals from the plant description alone lose up to 0.28 F1, whereas agents that see only anonymized signals recover most of the physical structure.

Full text

Read the paper on this page (6 pages), or open the PDF on its own.

Open the PDF

Community review

The authors invite signed reviews and endorsements from researchers who sign in with ORCID. Everything here is public and tied to version 1. How this works

0reviews 0endorsements 0comments
Review

A structured, signed review: an overall assessment, a summary and your main concerns.

Sign in to review
Endorse

A short, signed statement that you have read the paper and consider it sound and valuable.

Sign in to endorse

Both are public, signed with your name and ORCID iD, and tied to version 1. You declare that you have no conflict of interest with the paper.

Endorsements 0

No endorsements for this version yet.

Reviews 0

No reviews for this version yet.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Sign in to take part in the discussion.

Sign in